ReproDB and its underlying methodology are described in ReproDB: An Open Platform for Discovering Research Artifacts and Analyzing their Evaluation in Security and Systems by Vahldiek-Oberwagner, Bognar, and Signorello (ACM REP 2026).

If you use ReproDB in your research, please cite:

@inproceedings{vahldiek2026reprodb,
 author = {Vahldiek-Oberwagner, Anjo and Bognar, Marton and Signorello, Salvatore},
 title = {ReproDB: An Open Platform for Discovering Research Artifacts and Analyzing their Evaluation in Security and Systems},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability (ACM REP)},
 year = {2026}
}

Acknowledgements

This project celebrates the work of artifact authors who go the extra mile to make research reproducible, and artifact evaluation committees (AE chairs and members) who invest time reviewing and certifying artifacts. Their contributions strengthen our scientific record. We thank the communities maintaining sysartifacts and secartifacts for publishing detailed evaluation results. Inspired by Systems Circus and csrankings.org.

Report Issues or Fix Bugs

Found incorrect data, a broken page, or a scraping bug? Open an issue or pull request on the relevant repository:

Add Conference Data

AE results and committee lists live in the upstream community sites. Contribute new conferences or corrections there:

Suggest New Analyses

Have an idea for a new statistic, visualization, or ranking? Open a discussion and tell us what you’d like to see.